A Thought on Tractate Makkot

The Talmud in Tractate Makkot 23b, states that there are 613 mitzvot: 365 negative commandments, corresponding to the 365 days of the year, and 248 positive commandments, corresponding to the 248 body parts. It occurred to me that the Talmud presents negative commandments as temporally represented, while positive commandments are represented corporeally. The Mishnah above states that when one is idle and does not transgress, it is counted as if they performed a good deed. Keeping a negative commandment is measured by not doing, by the passage of time without a negative action. Therefore, it is represented temporally - 365 negative commandments, like the 365 days of the year. Positive commandments, on the other hand, require active engagement and are performed by the body. Thus, they are represented corporeally, by the 248 body parts.

Comments

Discovering the Talmudic Antoninus

Disovering Antoninus: Identifying the Talmudic Emperor as Septimius Severus - A Counter Narrative of Historical Memory Abstract: The enduring enigma of "Antoninus" in the Babylonian Talmud, the close Roman imperial confidante of Rabbi Judah the Prince, has long defied singular historical identification, leading scholars to posit a composite figure drawing from various emperors of the Antonine dynasty. This article challenges that prevailing view, proposing that Septimius Severus (reigned 193–211 CE) served as the singular historical referent for the Talmudic Antoninus, unifying previously disparate narrative threads into a coherent and historically grounded account. Through a critical re-examination of key Talmudic narratives—including the alleged requests for senatorial approval, the cryptic "Gira" story (with its nuanced, bidirectional plant counsel), the strategic "vegetable plucking" metaphor, the discussions on secrecy (underpinned by a pervasive at...

The Consuming Fire: Nadav and Avihu and the Perils of Unmediated Divine Proximity

The Death of Nadav and Avihu: A Unified Synthesis The deaths of Nadav and Avihu, Aaron's sons, are among the most cryptic and densely interpreted episodes in the Torah. Across Tannaitic and Amoraic literature, explanations multiply: some legal, others moral, mystical, or psychological. At first glance, they appear contradictory. But when synthesized, they reveal a coherent warning about the peril of unmediated spiritual desire in an era of intense Divine proximity. A Catalog of Reasons from the Sources: Strange Fire – They brought an "esh zarah," a strange fire not commanded by God (Lev. 10:1). Entering the Sanctuary After Drinking Wine – According to the Talmud, their death leads directly into the prohibition for priests to serve while intoxicated, implying their inebriation (Vayikra Rabbah, Torat Kohanim). Improper Attire – Vayikra Rabbah (20:9) explains that their death was due to lacking the me'il, the outer robe. Unmarried/No children ...

עד דלא ידע

Purim, Shekalim, and Quantum Concepts: A Novel Interpretation The Jewish calendar mandates the reading of Parshat Shekalim at the beginning of Adar, preceding the celebration of Purim. This practice, instituted by the Sages, serves as a replacement for the historical collection of Shekalim for the Temple, which commenced on the first of Adar. What is the relationship between Purim and the half-Shekel? The Talmud ( Megillah 13b) reveals that this pre-Purim reading was divinely orchestrated to counteract Haman’s offer of ten thousand silver talents. אָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ: גָּלוּי וְיָדוּעַ לִפְנֵי מִי שֶׁאָמַר וְהָיָה הָעוֹלָם שֶׁעָתִיד הָמָן לִשְׁקוֹל שְׁקָלִים עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל, לְפִיכָךְ הִקְדִּים שִׁקְלֵיהֶן לִשְׁקָלָיו. וְהַיְינוּ דִּתְנַן: בְּאֶחָד בַּאֲדָר מַשְׁמִיעִין עַל הַשְּׁקָלִים וְעַל הַכִּלְאַיִם. This raises a chronological question: How can the Shekalim , read before Purim, precede Haman’s actions during the Persian exile...

Search This Blog